Review



human foreskin fibroblasts  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    ATCC human foreskin fibroblasts
    Human Foreskin Fibroblasts, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 565 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+primary+dermal+foreskin+fibroblasts/Primary+Dermal+Fibroblast+Normal%3B+Human%2C+Neonatal/pm42266065-396-0-10
    Average 99 stars, based on 565 article reviews
    human foreskin fibroblasts - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    99/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Cell Culture:

    Article Title: Dense chitosan surgical membranes produced by a coincident compression-dehydration process.
    Article Snippet: .. Three human cell types were used: human primary keratinocytes (Lifeline Cell Technologies) cultured in DermaLife (Lifeline Cell Technologies); human primary dermal foreskin fibroblasts (ATCC) cultured in DMEM-high glucose, 5% Fetal Calf Serum, 1% penicillin-streptomycin; and human MC3T3 preosteoblasts subclone E4 (ATCC) cultured in Alpha MEM without aspartic acid (Invitrogen). .. Cell attachment and growth was analyzed during the next seven days using Cell Tracker Red live cell fluorescent stain (Invitrogen) and fluorescence microscopy.

    Article Title: Dense chitosan surgical membranes produced by a coincident compression-dehydration process
    Article Snippet: .. Three human cell types were used: human primary keratinocytes (Lifeline Cell Technologies) cultured in DermaLife (Lifeline Cell Technologies); human primary dermal foreskin fibroblasts (ATCC) cultured in DMEM-high glucose, 5% Fetal Calf Serum, 1% penicillin-streptomycin; and human MC3T3 pre-osteoblasts subclone E4 (ATCC) cultured in Alpha MEM without aspartic acid (Invitrogen). .. Cell attachment and growth was analyzed during the next seven days using Cell Tracker Red live cell fluorescent stain (Invitrogen) and fluorescence microscopy.



    Similar Products

    97
    PromoCell primary normal human dermal fibroblasts
    Primary Normal Human Dermal Fibroblasts, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+primary+dermal+foreskin+fibroblasts/Normal+Human+Dermal+Fibroblasts+(NHDF)+juvenile+foreskin/pm42820368-41-0-6
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary normal human dermal fibroblasts - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC human foreskin fibroblasts
    Human Foreskin Fibroblasts, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+primary+dermal+foreskin+fibroblasts/Primary+Dermal+Fibroblast+Normal%3B+Human%2C+Neonatal/pm42266065-396-0-10
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human foreskin fibroblasts - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    PromoCell primary normal human dermal fibroblasts hdf
    Primary Normal Human Dermal Fibroblasts Hdf, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+primary+dermal+foreskin+fibroblasts/Normal+Human+Dermal+Fibroblasts+(NHDF)+juvenile+foreskin/pmc13239468-72-0-9
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary normal human dermal fibroblasts hdf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    PromoCell primary human dermal fibroblasts hdfs
    Expression of early damage and stress-response genes ( a ) FDXR , ( b ) GADD45A , ( c ) SESN1 , and ( d ) GDF15 in irradiated <t>HDFs</t> (10 Gy) treated with exosomes (1 × 10 9 particles/mL) derived from BM-MSCs (BM-IR) and UC-MSCs (UC-IR), measured by qPCR. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH and expressed as fold change relative to the non-irradiated Vehicle control at each timepoint. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three technical replicates from a representative experiment performed using a single HDF donor. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 by ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test, comparing each treatment group to the Vehicle-IR control at the corresponding timepoint.
    Primary Human Dermal Fibroblasts Hdfs, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+primary+dermal+foreskin+fibroblasts/Normal+Human+Dermal+Fibroblasts+(NHDF)+juvenile+foreskin/pmc13113072-43-0-8
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary human dermal fibroblasts hdfs - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC neonatal foreskin fibroblasts
    Expression of early damage and stress-response genes ( a ) FDXR , ( b ) GADD45A , ( c ) SESN1 , and ( d ) GDF15 in irradiated <t>HDFs</t> (10 Gy) treated with exosomes (1 × 10 9 particles/mL) derived from BM-MSCs (BM-IR) and UC-MSCs (UC-IR), measured by qPCR. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH and expressed as fold change relative to the non-irradiated Vehicle control at each timepoint. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three technical replicates from a representative experiment performed using a single HDF donor. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 by ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test, comparing each treatment group to the Vehicle-IR control at the corresponding timepoint.
    Neonatal Foreskin Fibroblasts, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+primary+dermal+foreskin+fibroblasts/Primary+Dermal+Fibroblast+Normal%3B+Human%2C+Neonatal/bio_rxiv__64898__2025__12__20__695666-250-22-25
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    neonatal foreskin fibroblasts - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    PromoCell primary dermal fibroblasts
    Expression of early damage and stress-response genes ( a ) FDXR , ( b ) GADD45A , ( c ) SESN1 , and ( d ) GDF15 in irradiated <t>HDFs</t> (10 Gy) treated with exosomes (1 × 10 9 particles/mL) derived from BM-MSCs (BM-IR) and UC-MSCs (UC-IR), measured by qPCR. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH and expressed as fold change relative to the non-irradiated Vehicle control at each timepoint. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three technical replicates from a representative experiment performed using a single HDF donor. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 by ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test, comparing each treatment group to the Vehicle-IR control at the corresponding timepoint.
    Primary Dermal Fibroblasts, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+primary+dermal+foreskin+fibroblasts/Normal+Human+Dermal+Fibroblasts+(NHDF)+juvenile+foreskin/pmc12481569__jm5c01193_si_001-140-12-15
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary dermal fibroblasts - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    PromoCell primary human foreskin fibroblasts
    Expression of early damage and stress-response genes ( a ) FDXR , ( b ) GADD45A , ( c ) SESN1 , and ( d ) GDF15 in irradiated <t>HDFs</t> (10 Gy) treated with exosomes (1 × 10 9 particles/mL) derived from BM-MSCs (BM-IR) and UC-MSCs (UC-IR), measured by qPCR. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH and expressed as fold change relative to the non-irradiated Vehicle control at each timepoint. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three technical replicates from a representative experiment performed using a single HDF donor. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 by ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test, comparing each treatment group to the Vehicle-IR control at the corresponding timepoint.
    Primary Human Foreskin Fibroblasts, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+primary+dermal+foreskin+fibroblasts/NHDF-c+Human+Dermal+Fibroblasts/pmc12316387-189-0-5
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary human foreskin fibroblasts - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    PromoCell normal human primary dermal fibroblasts nhdf
    (A) Schematic diagram of transwell secretome experiment. ( B) TEER measurements of hLEC monolayers after 48 hours of treatment with dermal <t>fibroblast</t> secretomes with <t>[NHDF(G)]</t> and without growth factors [NHDF(B)]. ( C) Representative immunofluorescence images of VE-cadherin, claudin-5, and ZO-1 on hLECs following treatment with NHDF secretomes. (D) Quantification of VE-cadherin, claudin-5, and ZO-1 expression levels using ImageJ (FIJI). (E) Quantification of lymphatic markers LYVE-1 and PROX1 expression in hLEC monolayers treated with NHDF secretomes. (F) FITC–Dextran (4 kDa) transport assay across hLECs after NHDF secretome treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from n = 6 independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed t -test; p > 0.05 = not significant (ns), p ≤ 0.0001 = extremely significant (****). For the permeability (transport) assay ( n = 3, representative), statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by appropriate post hoc test for multiple comparisons.
    Normal Human Primary Dermal Fibroblasts Nhdf, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+primary+dermal+foreskin+fibroblasts/Normal+Human+Dermal+Fibroblasts+(NHDF)+juvenile+foreskin/bio_rxiv__2025__04__17__649442-152-0-13
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    normal human primary dermal fibroblasts nhdf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Expression of early damage and stress-response genes ( a ) FDXR , ( b ) GADD45A , ( c ) SESN1 , and ( d ) GDF15 in irradiated HDFs (10 Gy) treated with exosomes (1 × 10 9 particles/mL) derived from BM-MSCs (BM-IR) and UC-MSCs (UC-IR), measured by qPCR. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH and expressed as fold change relative to the non-irradiated Vehicle control at each timepoint. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three technical replicates from a representative experiment performed using a single HDF donor. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 by ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test, comparing each treatment group to the Vehicle-IR control at the corresponding timepoint.

    Journal: Biomedicines

    Article Title: Mesenchymal Stem Cell–Derived Exosomes Mitigate Cutaneous Radiation Injury Through Coordinated Modulation of DNA Repair, Stress, and Inflammatory Gene Programs

    doi: 10.3390/biomedicines14040811

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Expression of early damage and stress-response genes ( a ) FDXR , ( b ) GADD45A , ( c ) SESN1 , and ( d ) GDF15 in irradiated HDFs (10 Gy) treated with exosomes (1 × 10 9 particles/mL) derived from BM-MSCs (BM-IR) and UC-MSCs (UC-IR), measured by qPCR. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH and expressed as fold change relative to the non-irradiated Vehicle control at each timepoint. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three technical replicates from a representative experiment performed using a single HDF donor. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 by ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test, comparing each treatment group to the Vehicle-IR control at the corresponding timepoint.

    Article Snippet: Primary human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) were purchased from PromoCell GmbH (SKU: C-12302; Heidelberg, Germany).

    Techniques: Expressing, Irradiation, Derivative Assay, Gene Expression, Control

    Expression of DNA repair and antioxidant genes ( a ) DDB2 , ( b ) RNF8 , and ( c ) SOD1 in irradiated HDFs (10 Gy) treated with exosomes (1 × 10 9 particles/mL) derived from BM-MSCs (BM-IR) and UC-MSCs (UC-IR), measured by qPCR. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH and expressed as fold change relative to the non-irradiated Vehicle control at each timepoint. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three technical replicates from a representative experiment performed using a single HDF donor. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, by ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test comparing each treatment group to the Vehicle-IR control at the corresponding timepoint.

    Journal: Biomedicines

    Article Title: Mesenchymal Stem Cell–Derived Exosomes Mitigate Cutaneous Radiation Injury Through Coordinated Modulation of DNA Repair, Stress, and Inflammatory Gene Programs

    doi: 10.3390/biomedicines14040811

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Expression of DNA repair and antioxidant genes ( a ) DDB2 , ( b ) RNF8 , and ( c ) SOD1 in irradiated HDFs (10 Gy) treated with exosomes (1 × 10 9 particles/mL) derived from BM-MSCs (BM-IR) and UC-MSCs (UC-IR), measured by qPCR. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH and expressed as fold change relative to the non-irradiated Vehicle control at each timepoint. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three technical replicates from a representative experiment performed using a single HDF donor. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, by ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test comparing each treatment group to the Vehicle-IR control at the corresponding timepoint.

    Article Snippet: Primary human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) were purchased from PromoCell GmbH (SKU: C-12302; Heidelberg, Germany).

    Techniques: Expressing, Irradiation, Derivative Assay, Gene Expression, Control

    Expression of cell-cycle regulation and proliferation genes ( a ) CDKN1A , ( b ) CDKN2A , ( c ) MKI67 , ( d ) H2AFX , and ( e ) VEGFA in irradiated HDFs (10 Gy) treated with exosomes (1 × 10 9 particles/mL) derived from BM-MSCs (BM-IR) and UC-MSCs (UC-IR), measured by qPCR. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH and expressed as fold change relative to the non-irradiated Vehicle control at each timepoint. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three technical replicates from a representative experiment performed using a single HDF donor. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 by ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test, comparing each treatment group to the Vehicle-IR control at the corresponding timepoint.

    Journal: Biomedicines

    Article Title: Mesenchymal Stem Cell–Derived Exosomes Mitigate Cutaneous Radiation Injury Through Coordinated Modulation of DNA Repair, Stress, and Inflammatory Gene Programs

    doi: 10.3390/biomedicines14040811

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Expression of cell-cycle regulation and proliferation genes ( a ) CDKN1A , ( b ) CDKN2A , ( c ) MKI67 , ( d ) H2AFX , and ( e ) VEGFA in irradiated HDFs (10 Gy) treated with exosomes (1 × 10 9 particles/mL) derived from BM-MSCs (BM-IR) and UC-MSCs (UC-IR), measured by qPCR. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH and expressed as fold change relative to the non-irradiated Vehicle control at each timepoint. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three technical replicates from a representative experiment performed using a single HDF donor. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 by ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test, comparing each treatment group to the Vehicle-IR control at the corresponding timepoint.

    Article Snippet: Primary human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) were purchased from PromoCell GmbH (SKU: C-12302; Heidelberg, Germany).

    Techniques: Expressing, Irradiation, Derivative Assay, Gene Expression, Control

    Expression of inflammatory response genes ( a ) IL-6 and ( b ) TNFAIP3 in irradiated HDFs (10 Gy) treated with exosomes (1 × 10 9 particles/mL) derived from BM-MSCs (BM-IR) and UC-MSCs (UC-IR), measured by qPCR. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH and expressed as fold change relative to the non-irradiated Vehicle control at each timepoint. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three technical replicates from a representative experiment performed using a single HDF donor. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001 by ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test, comparing each treatment group to the Vehicle-IR control at the corresponding timepoint.

    Journal: Biomedicines

    Article Title: Mesenchymal Stem Cell–Derived Exosomes Mitigate Cutaneous Radiation Injury Through Coordinated Modulation of DNA Repair, Stress, and Inflammatory Gene Programs

    doi: 10.3390/biomedicines14040811

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Expression of inflammatory response genes ( a ) IL-6 and ( b ) TNFAIP3 in irradiated HDFs (10 Gy) treated with exosomes (1 × 10 9 particles/mL) derived from BM-MSCs (BM-IR) and UC-MSCs (UC-IR), measured by qPCR. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH and expressed as fold change relative to the non-irradiated Vehicle control at each timepoint. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three technical replicates from a representative experiment performed using a single HDF donor. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001 by ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test, comparing each treatment group to the Vehicle-IR control at the corresponding timepoint.

    Article Snippet: Primary human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) were purchased from PromoCell GmbH (SKU: C-12302; Heidelberg, Germany).

    Techniques: Expressing, Irradiation, Derivative Assay, Gene Expression, Control

    (A) Schematic diagram of transwell secretome experiment. ( B) TEER measurements of hLEC monolayers after 48 hours of treatment with dermal fibroblast secretomes with [NHDF(G)] and without growth factors [NHDF(B)]. ( C) Representative immunofluorescence images of VE-cadherin, claudin-5, and ZO-1 on hLECs following treatment with NHDF secretomes. (D) Quantification of VE-cadherin, claudin-5, and ZO-1 expression levels using ImageJ (FIJI). (E) Quantification of lymphatic markers LYVE-1 and PROX1 expression in hLEC monolayers treated with NHDF secretomes. (F) FITC–Dextran (4 kDa) transport assay across hLECs after NHDF secretome treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from n = 6 independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed t -test; p > 0.05 = not significant (ns), p ≤ 0.0001 = extremely significant (****). For the permeability (transport) assay ( n = 3, representative), statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by appropriate post hoc test for multiple comparisons.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Fibroblasts regulate lymphatic barrier functions in a tissue dependent manner

    doi: 10.1101/2025.04.17.649442

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic diagram of transwell secretome experiment. ( B) TEER measurements of hLEC monolayers after 48 hours of treatment with dermal fibroblast secretomes with [NHDF(G)] and without growth factors [NHDF(B)]. ( C) Representative immunofluorescence images of VE-cadherin, claudin-5, and ZO-1 on hLECs following treatment with NHDF secretomes. (D) Quantification of VE-cadherin, claudin-5, and ZO-1 expression levels using ImageJ (FIJI). (E) Quantification of lymphatic markers LYVE-1 and PROX1 expression in hLEC monolayers treated with NHDF secretomes. (F) FITC–Dextran (4 kDa) transport assay across hLECs after NHDF secretome treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from n = 6 independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed t -test; p > 0.05 = not significant (ns), p ≤ 0.0001 = extremely significant (****). For the permeability (transport) assay ( n = 3, representative), statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by appropriate post hoc test for multiple comparisons.

    Article Snippet: Normal human primary dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) were cultured in two conditions: (1) NHDF(G) (PromoCell, C-12302) in Fibroblast Growth Medium-2 (PromoCell, C-23120) containing 2% FBS, 1 ng/mL fibroblast growth factor, and 5 μg/mL insulin, or (2) NHDF(B) in fibroblast basal medium without supplements.

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Expressing, Transport Assay, Two Tailed Test, Permeability

    (A) Schematic diagram of transwell co-culture experiment. (B ) Schematic diagram of cells seedings and co-culture. (C) TEER measurements of hLEC monolayers after 48 hours of co-culture with dermal fibroblast with [NHDF(G)] and without growth factors [NHDF(B)]. (D) Representative immunofluorescence images of VE-cadherin, and ZO-1 on hLECs following co-culture with NHDFs. (E) Quantification of VE-cadherin and ZO-1 expression levels using ImageJ (FIJI). (F) FITC–Dextran (4 kDa) transport assay across hLECs after co-culture with NHDFs. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from n = 6 independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed t -test; p > 0.05 = not significant (ns), p ≤ 0.0001 = extremely significant (****). For the permeability (transport) assay ( n = 5, representative), statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by appropriate post hoc test for multiple comparisons.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Fibroblasts regulate lymphatic barrier functions in a tissue dependent manner

    doi: 10.1101/2025.04.17.649442

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic diagram of transwell co-culture experiment. (B ) Schematic diagram of cells seedings and co-culture. (C) TEER measurements of hLEC monolayers after 48 hours of co-culture with dermal fibroblast with [NHDF(G)] and without growth factors [NHDF(B)]. (D) Representative immunofluorescence images of VE-cadherin, and ZO-1 on hLECs following co-culture with NHDFs. (E) Quantification of VE-cadherin and ZO-1 expression levels using ImageJ (FIJI). (F) FITC–Dextran (4 kDa) transport assay across hLECs after co-culture with NHDFs. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from n = 6 independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed t -test; p > 0.05 = not significant (ns), p ≤ 0.0001 = extremely significant (****). For the permeability (transport) assay ( n = 5, representative), statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by appropriate post hoc test for multiple comparisons.

    Article Snippet: Normal human primary dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) were cultured in two conditions: (1) NHDF(G) (PromoCell, C-12302) in Fibroblast Growth Medium-2 (PromoCell, C-23120) containing 2% FBS, 1 ng/mL fibroblast growth factor, and 5 μg/mL insulin, or (2) NHDF(B) in fibroblast basal medium without supplements.

    Techniques: Co-Culture Assay, Immunofluorescence, Expressing, Transport Assay, Two Tailed Test, Permeability

    (A) TEER measurements of hLEC monolayers after 4 hours of thrombin treatment followed by 48 hours of co-culture with dermal fibroblast (NHDF(G) ( n = 3 ). (B) Total cell counts ( n = 6 ). (C) FITC–Dextran (4 kDa) transport assay across hLECs after 4 hours of thrombin stimulation and/or NHDF co-culture for 48 hours. (D) Representative immunofluorescence images of ZO-1 and VE-cadherin on hLECs with and without thrombin treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from n = 3-6 independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed t -test; p > 0.05 = not significant (ns), p ≤ 0.0001 = extremely significant (****). For the transport assay, statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by appropriate post hoc test for multiple comparisons.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Fibroblasts regulate lymphatic barrier functions in a tissue dependent manner

    doi: 10.1101/2025.04.17.649442

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) TEER measurements of hLEC monolayers after 4 hours of thrombin treatment followed by 48 hours of co-culture with dermal fibroblast (NHDF(G) ( n = 3 ). (B) Total cell counts ( n = 6 ). (C) FITC–Dextran (4 kDa) transport assay across hLECs after 4 hours of thrombin stimulation and/or NHDF co-culture for 48 hours. (D) Representative immunofluorescence images of ZO-1 and VE-cadherin on hLECs with and without thrombin treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from n = 3-6 independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed t -test; p > 0.05 = not significant (ns), p ≤ 0.0001 = extremely significant (****). For the transport assay, statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by appropriate post hoc test for multiple comparisons.

    Article Snippet: Normal human primary dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) were cultured in two conditions: (1) NHDF(G) (PromoCell, C-12302) in Fibroblast Growth Medium-2 (PromoCell, C-23120) containing 2% FBS, 1 ng/mL fibroblast growth factor, and 5 μg/mL insulin, or (2) NHDF(B) in fibroblast basal medium without supplements.

    Techniques: Co-Culture Assay, Transport Assay, Immunofluorescence, Two Tailed Test